no longer necessary to call super().process_frame(frame, direction) #849
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Btw, this is backwards compatible. If you call |
aconchillo
force-pushed
the
aleix/no-need-for-super-process-frame
branch
from
d57213b to
3c3fd67
Compare
markbackman
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please describe the changes in your PR. If it is addressing an issue, please reference that as well.
It's no longer necessary to call
super().process_frame(frame, direction)if you subclass and implementFrameProcessor.process_frame(). This is all now done internally and will avoid possible issues if you forget to add it.